|
THE SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR OF TOP US OFFICIALS ON SEPT 11 If you were responsible for the defence of a country, and you knew that coordinated suicide hijackings were occurring, then you wouldn’t behave as described below unless you wanted the attacks to succeed. The articles below are from Jared Israel, Illarion Bykov and Francisco Gil-White. They were pioneering articles, from Jan to Oct 2002. As explained in the introduction to other articles from the same website in the stand down section , the authors made one fundamental mistake—an understandable one at the time - in assuming at the tine that the hijackings actually took place as told to us. Within the context of accepting this assumption, the following articles are an excellent analysis of the suspicious and complicit behaviour of top US officials as the attacks were unfolding. 9-ll:Ho hum, nothing urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open Jan 18 2002 by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel. Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange press conference. By Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002. Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2: White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC Comments by Jared Israel 12 September 2002 Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 20- 25 minutes ? Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage of this amazing behaviour. |
|
GERARD HOLMGREN’S SEPT 11 WRITING AND RESEARCH |