ANALYSIS OF HIP HOP PLANE

Copyright: Oct 2 2006 This article or any part of it may not be reproduced without the express permission of the author in writing. This prohibition excludes the reasonable quotation of the article for the purpose of analysis or criticism of the article itself - providing that the article is linked to in association with any such analysis.

 

This article makes some observations about a CNN video of the “plane” hitting the WTC. The video has been broken into frames, and the quickest and easiest way to see how fake this video is, is to go to frame 75 and then use the “next”  button to step one by one through the next 10 frames.

 

If you have your eyes and brain connected , it will be obvious without any deep analysis that this video—purported to be real footage of a real plane hitting the WTC and aired as such on CNN—is a pathetic fake.

 

This article also makes a few extra points about this video which might not be so obvious. These points further reinforce the physical impossibility of what that video purports to show.

 

If you’ve stepped through frames 75 to 85, as I suggested, you’ll notice that the plane only moves every second frame. A video of a real plane would show the plane moving every frame. You’ll also see that at frame 79 the nose is just making contact with the building. In frame 80, it’s in exactly the same spot. In frame 81, it’s about 1/3 of the way into the building—with no sign of any disturbance to either plane or building, and in frame 82 it’s still in exactly the same spot. In frame 83, it’s about 2/3 the way in, still with no disturbance of any kind to plane or building, even though the wings are now completely “inside” the building. We can see that the holes which later appeared in the building, supposedly punched by the wings, have not yet appeared, even though the wings have disappeared. The impact area is partially masked by a building in the foreground, but we can still see enough to see that the hole which should be in the building has not appeared. In frame 84, the plane is still in exactly the same spot. And in frame 85, it’s completely disappeared, supposedly inside the building, and yet there is still no disturbance to the building.

 

The impossibility of this is obvious, but let’s also look at the speed of the  cartoon plane. The number of frames which it takes to enter the building enables us to work out to how fast it would be travelling, if it were real.

 

Firstly , we can see that there is no sign of deceleration. The last third of the plane enters in the same number of frames as the first. In a real crash of a plane into a building, assuming that the plane did enter fully inside the building, the last section would enter more slowly than the first. The deceleration wouldn’t be discernable at full speed, but the whole idea of frame by frame replay is that it enables us to see things like this in increments of 1/30th of a second. This is how we are able to pick real events captured on video from animations.

 

The plane is alleged to be a 767 which is about 160 ft long. A 767 has a typical cruising speed of 530 mph at 35,000 ft.

 

Let’s calculate the approximate speed of the plane as the first 1/3 of it enters the building. This is achieved in 1 frame which is approximately 1/30th of a sec.  1/3 of 160 ft is 53.3 ft. So the speed of the plane as the first 1/3 of it enters the building is approximately 53.3 x 30 ft per sec = 1600 ft/ sec.

Convert this to mph.  1600 x 60 x 60 ft per hour = 5,760,000 ft per hour = 1090 mph.

 

Amazing.  A plane which normally flies about 530 mph at high altitude somehow doing double this at low altitude—while barging it’s way through a building ! Then there’s the problem of how it can be doing 1090 mph in one frame and then suddenly zero in the next frame, and then 1090 again in the next frame and then zero again and then 1090 again.

 

Even if you descend into total fantasy and suggest that in every two frames of video, all the movement somehow is transferred to one frame, it’s still averaging about 545 mph—even when the last 1/3 of it is going through the building.

 

Let’s consider that again. A plane which has a normal cruising speed of 530 mph at 35,000 ft is alleged to be travelling so fast at low altitude that even when it’s 2/3 of the way smashing through a building (without making a hole), it’s still doing 545 mph.

 

Of course, these measurements are approximate, but they are so far removed from reality that there is little point in finer analysis. To quibble over whether its exactly 1/3 of the plane in the last two frames would be like arguing over whether that person was really killed by that falling steel weight, because you’re unsure whether it weighed 6 tons or 8 tons and unsure of whether it fell from 20 ft or 30 ft.

 

The plane in this video is a crude fake.

 

 

     GERARD HOLMGREN’S SEPT 11 WRITING AND RESEARCH