Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash
by Gerard Holmgren

It is not in dispute that something hit the Pentagon wall and damaged it. Neither is it in dispute that AA 77 is missing. But was AA 77 involved in the Pentagon incident? This article presents an analysis of the physical aspects of the incident, and concludes with a brief examination of the issue of eyewitnesses

INTRODUCTION

PART 1. PLANE SPECIFICATIONS

PART 2. ESTIMATIONS OF HOLE DIMENSIONS

PART 3. ENTRY IMPACT CALCULATIONS AT 90 DEGREE FUSELAGE ANGLE

PART 4. EXPLOSION ANALYSIS AT 90 DEGREE FUSELAGE ANGLE

PART 5. ENTRY CALCULATIONS - FUSELAGE AT 45 DEGREES

PART 6. FUEL LOAD ANALYSIS.

PART 7. WERE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DIFFERENT ON SEPT 11?

PART 8. “BUT WRECKAGE WAS FOUND.”

PART 9. DNA TESTING

PART 10. THE HOLE IN THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL

PART 11. WHAT ABOUT THE EYEWITNESSES?

SUMMARY

PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF PENTAGON CRASH.

by Gerard Holmgren

investigation77@hotmail.com

Copyright: Gerard Holmgren. October 23 2002.This work may be freely copied and distributed without permission as long as it is not for commercial purposes. Please include the author's name, the web adress where you found it, and the copyright notice.

WHERE IS THE WRECKAGE OF AA 77?
INSIDE THE BUILDING?
OUTSIDE THE BUILDING?
CREMATED?
OR NEVER THERE?

It is alleged that on Sept 11, 2001 a hijacked Boeing 757,
American Airlines Flight 77, hit the Pentagon. It is not in dispute that something hit the Pentagon wall and damaged it. Neither is it in dispute that AA 77 is missing. But was AA 77 involved in the Pentagon incident? This article presents an analysis of the physical aspects of the incident, and concludes with a brief examination of the issue of eyewitnesses.

The Sept 11 crashes are unique and unprecedented events in the history of both the press and aviation. In many cases, light plane crashes involving 2 to 3 people have triggered investigations which continued for years. Considering that the explosion and cremation of planes had never before happened, the lack of reporting and/or official investigation is doubly puzzling. The issue of whether a crash results from sabotage or accident should be irrelevant to the alarming question of why four planes allegedly cremated themselves as a result of low to medium impact crashes.

One of the purposes of accident reconstruction in plane crashes is to determine what failed and therefore what is subject to improvement. Normally, the press releases the findings as news in the public interest. Professional analytical information has not been released on the September 11 crashes. If it exists (for insurance purposes, for instance), it has not been released. Why have authorities and the press treated the Sept 11 crashes differently? Who is doing the professional analysis and why does the public not have access to it?

(((NEXT)))