Date: 2004/04/07 23:57
From: Scott Loughrey <scottl44@yahoo.com>
To: The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
Another problem with John using Rense to make a call
for assistance with the 911 survivors is how many
people do we know actually will respond? If people
get snuffed and no one seriously responds to John's
call we make it damn hard for the stunt to be
repeated.
Rense has what, a million visitors a day? How many
visitors are just anti-Semitic Nazis?
SL
--- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> If anyone associated with BETCHEL,
> BURSON-MARSTELLER, Gov. Weld, or
> Goldman Sachs gets in trouble, I shrug.
> It''t them or us.
> I still rue that I let you bury that lovely piece of
> evidence of the
> helicopter pilot that didn't see no plane, even tho
> he was flying the
> same path toward it, if it existed.
>
> Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> whatever the motivation.
>
> This is important information to uncover this
> gruesome scam.
>
> WE are dealing with well placed, well played
> "American Heroes" , and if
> we don't have a LOT of backup, naming whatever names
> we can name, they
> will just make us look like traitorous shits.
>
> Kaminski can get the issue recognition.
> No Heroes is even tougher for the tellytubbies to
> take than No Planes, I
> think.
>
> But the fictional aspects of the story need to be
> recognized and exposed
> in order for people to catch on that what has
> happened since is often
> fictional setups played to the balconies.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scott Loughrey wrote:
>
> >I think someone would end up dead if you did that.
> >Shrubbed by the Empire.
> >
> >I like the idea of adding recruits, though.
> >
> >Scott
> >
> >
> >--- John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Hello All,
> >> I just had a brainstorm, maybe. If we could
> put
> >>together an e-mail
> >>consisting the appropriate links of the database
> on
> >>the 9/11 victims and
> >>then the links about proper ways to verify their
> >>existences, and then
> >>put them in an e-mail call for volunteers, we
> could
> >>do a seriously
> >>efficient epidemiological study on this. If you
> >>could construct the
> >>study parameters and methods, I'd be glad to send
> it
> >>out to my list,
> >>highlight it on Rense etc., and the volunteers who
> >>respond would be
> >>assigned a certain letter or letters of the
> alphabet
> >>to check out. My
> >>list is 1,800 and I sent to about 60 newsgroups,
> who
> >>then presumably
> >>would also publish it, so I think we could find at
> >>least 26 volunteers.
> >>I wouldn't want to be the one to make the
> >>assignments or coordinate the
> >>results, but I sure as heck would publicize the
> >>results. It could be a
> >>momentous news story.
> >>
> >>jk
> >>
> >>No Anthrax Vaccine wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> The story about Mark Bingham, calling his "mom,"
> >>>
> >>and saying, "Hi,
> >>
> >>>mom, this is Mark Bingham," of course, sounded a
> >>>
> >>little fruity. It
> >>
> >>>seems like the names can't be found anywhere in
> >>>
> >>the Social Security
> >>
> >>>Death Index for these fruity stories. However,
> >>>
> >>some of the names do
> >>
> >>>check out. Which leads me to believe there may
> >>>
> >>have been fake names
> >>
> >>>listed along with real ones, while the fake
> family
> >>>
> >>members may not
> >>
> >>>have a problem with what they are doing because
> >>>
> >>they are under
> >>
> >>>impression there are no real victims. I suspect
> >>>
> >>the whole operation
> >>
> >>>was much more of a theatrical stunt than we will
> >>>
> >>ever know. But, I
> >>
> >>>found something INCREDIBLY BIZARRE! Remember the
> >>>
> >>name Todd Beamer,
> >>
> >>>and his big "phone call?" I am wondering if it
> is
> >>>
> >>the same Todd
> >>
> >>>Beamer who was born on...., well, just look at
> the
> >>>
> >>record I found
> >>
> >>>below:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Name Birth Death Last Last SSN
>
> >> Issued Tools
> Order
> >> Residence Benefit
>
> >>
> >>Record?
> >> 10
> >> TODD E 11 Jun (none
>
> >> SS-5 Letter
> >> BEAMER Sep 1997 (72) specified)
> >>544-92-3952 Oregon Add Post-em [Click here to
> order
> >>a copy of the original record]
> >> 1968
>
> >> Search Ancestry.com
> >> (P)
> >>
> >>> Isn't that cute? The only Todd Beamer that came
> >>>
> >>up in the SSDI, and
> >>
> >>>he just happened to be born on....September 11,
> >>>
> >>1968. Talk about a
> >>
> >>>"coincidence."
> >>>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> >http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------
> Any time you're ready to catch on....
> http://cloakanddagger.ca
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/